|
The Wilke hypothesis, named after Christian Gottlob Wilke, is a proposed solution to the synoptic problem, holding that the Gospel of Mark was used as a source by the Gospel of Luke, then both of these were used as sources by the Gospel of Matthew. Thus, it posits Marcan priority and Matthaean posteriority. ==History== Storr, in his groundbreaking 1786 argument for Marcan priority, asked, if Mark was a source for Matthew and Luke, how the latter two were then related. Storr proposed, among other possibilities, that canonical Greek Matthew was adapted from an earlier Aramaic Matthew (the ''logia'' spoken of by Papias) by following Mark primarily but also drawing from Luke, although he later went on to oppose this.〔For a history of the hypothesis, see 〕 These ideas were little noticed until 1838, when C. G. Wilke revived the hypothesis of Marcan priority and extensively developed the argument for Matthaean posteriority. Wilke's contemporary Weisse at the same time independently argued for Marcan priority but for Matthew and Luke independently using Mark and another source Q—the two-source hypothesis. A few other German scholars supported Wilke's hypothesis in the nineteenth century, but in time most came to accept the two-source hypothesis, which remains the dominant theory to this day. Wilke's hypothesis was accepted by Karl Kautsky in his ''Foundations of Christianity''. 〔(Karl Kautsky ''Foundations of Christianity'' )〕 Wilke's hypothesis received little further attention until recent decades, when it was revived in 1992 by Huggins,〔 Reprinted in 〕 then Hengel, then independently by Blair. Additional recent supporters include Garrow and Powell. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)』 ■ウィキペディアで「Wilke hypothesis」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク
|